Jan Levine: My predictions for the remainder of the playoffs post-quarterfinals Bridging off my quarterfinals predictions...

Sorry for ruining the old blog.

I like your predictions. Especially with how they play out for the picks.

Panarin Zib Kreider
Buch Strome Kravtsov
Lemieux Chtyil Kakko
Andersson Howden Fast

Skjei D'Angelo
Hajek Shatty
Fox Lindgren
Staal

Hank
Georgie

Have to move: Namestikov, Nieves, Smith, Vesey
- TommyGTrain

Noticed this on the last blog.

I like all of this. That third line while a little green would be hard to play against.

Lot of dead money on the books.

Sorry for ruining the old blog.

I like your predictions. Especially with how they play out for the picks.
- JRR1285

- jimbro83

You're gonna get us in trouble again.

- jimbro83

Noticed this on the last blog.

I like all of this. That third line while a little green would be hard to play against.

Lot of dead money on the books.
- JRR1285

Would love Fox, not overpaying to get him.

Would love Fox, not overpaying to get him.
- airjan23

If Dallas doesn't win 2 rounds I believe that second rounder from them is #49, I'd be willing to give that pick for Fox

Would love Fox, not overpaying to get him.
- airjan23

I agree but Jimbo's offer sounds OK to me.

Need to get rid of Staal and maybe Shattenkirk. Not sure if letting him go is the right move though.

- jimbro83

Sorry for ruining the old blog.

I like your predictions. Especially with how they play out for the picks.
- JRR1285

Only one page off the rails, we were still talking hockey.
Well thought out predictions, Jan. Could see that happening.

Sorry for ruining the old blog.

I like your predictions. Especially with how they play out for the picks.
- JRR1285

If Dallas doesn't win 2 rounds I believe that second rounder from them is #49, I'd be willing to give that pick for Fox
- jimbro83

I think that's too high. We can still get a good player at 49 AND have Fox one year later.

I'm sticking with the third rounder and nothing higher if the reports that he ONLY wants to play for the Rangers are true.

I agree but Jimbo's offer sounds OK to me.

Need to get rid of Staal and maybe Shattenkirk. Not sure if letting him go is the right move though.
- JRR1285

That's why I suggested trading them Names for Fox. Yeah, on the surface it's an overpayment. However, you kill two birds with one stone by getting rid of the cap hit. Plus, get to keep your draft picks.

Noticed this on the last blog.

I like all of this. That third line while a little green would be hard to play against.

Lot of dead money on the books.
- JRR1285

Was going to comment on that lineup too. Maybe not Cup contenders, but playoff bound.
Especially after Ruff becomes a sunspot.

I have a feeling the devils are taking Kakko. Is there a huge difference between the two? And which one would you guys rather we get if we had a choice?

I have a feeling the devils are taking Kakko. Is there a huge difference between the two? And which one would you guys rather we get if we had a choice?
- Bobd62

I'd prefer Kakko, but I could get very into having Jack Hughes, very excited if we get him too

I think that's too high. We can still get a good player at 49 AND have Fox one year later.

I'm sticking with the third rounder and nothing higher if the reports that he ONLY wants to play for the Rangers are true.
- Bean_Dip

Agreed.
Even if that rumor isn't true, we still have a legit shot at signing Fox for free. I would give up a 3rd though just to be sure.

That's why I suggested trading them Names for Fox. Yeah, on the surface it's an overpayment. However, you kill two birds with one stone by getting rid of the cap hit. Plus, get to keep your draft picks.
- 2sticks1puck

Canes might want a pick as well for taking on that salary, but I would do it.

I have a feeling the devils are taking Kakko. Is there a huge difference between the two? And which one would you guys rather we get if we had a choice?
- Bobd62

Not much of a difference other than the one that the Rangers don't draft is not going to be a bust

I have a feeling the devils are taking Kakko. Is there a huge difference between the two? And which one would you guys rather we get if we had a choice?
- Bobd62

When was the las time a consensus #1 didn't go 1st overall?

I'd prefer Kakko, but I could get very into having Jack Hughes, very excited if we get him too
- jimbro83

Me too, still a win either way.

Not much of a difference other than the one that the Rangers don't draft is not going to be a bust
- eichiefs9

Sporting news mock draft 3.0.

http://www.sportingnews.c...kxnq43a3o7ss169ktrv968l2p

Only one page off the rails, we were still talking hockey.
Well thought out predictions, Jan. Could see that happening.
- Fenrir

Thank you.